One of the most common questions I hear from HR teams early in conversations is, “Do you allow people to recognize each other with points?”. I reply “No we don’t” then explain why Blueboard isn’t a points-based system.
In today’s digitally-charged workplaces, points-based employee reward systems have become the default solution for employee recognition platforms that often get classified as a “checklist item”. The simple existence of an employee recognition program satisfies many organizations.
Before regressing to the default solution, HR leadership should assess the merits of such programs. Here are my thoughts after 4 years of exclusively working on improving employee recognition programs, and thousands of conversations around the subject.
What is a points-based employee reward system?
Let’s start with the basics: employee recognition is when a peer, manager, or company wants to say “thank you” to an employee. Frequently, this type of employee recognition is tied to an employee reward — which can come in many forms like cash, gift cards, experiences, or points.
A points-based employee reward system works by allowing a sender to give points to a recipient, which are tied to an obscured, specific dollar value on the backend. It depends on how an organization decides to structure its system, but these points can usually be redeemed for merchandise, gift cards, or travel incentives from an employee rewards catalog.
While this may initially sound like an effective system, the inherent use of points leads to many problems with delivering impactful employee recognition. This is further reflected by the fact that, despite over $90B being spent on non-cash employee rewards in the U.S. every year (which includes everything from travel to gift cards to points-based systems), Bersin by Deloitte found in a study that 87% of employee incentives investments have zero impact on organizational goals — including employee motivation, employee engagement, performance, and retention rates. Let’s take a closer look at points-based employee reward systems, and explore why this may be the case.
What do points-based employee reward systems accomplish?
First, it’s important to acknowledge the strengths of a points-based employee reward system. There are a few reasons why this approach to employee recognition may be a good fit for your company, especially if your organization is strapped for resources and budget.
1. Low maintenance
Points-based employee rewards may be a convenient choice if you’re looking for a low-maintenance employee recognition program. Since the system is centralized in one digital platform, it’s easy for your HR team to enable managers or peers to give points at their convenience, have controls in place for quantities of points distributed, and track who is giving and receiving points — all in the same place.
2. High frequency
Another merit of a points-based employee reward program is that they give you the flexibility to reward in a larger range of dollar increments. For instance, if your company has a limited monthly budget to dedicate to an employee recognition program, a points-based employee reward system lets you dole out smaller dollar amounts more frequently. This creates more employee recognition touch points and spot recognition with employees without having to break the bank.
But where do points-based employee rewards miss the mark?
If your company has the time and budget to dedicate to a more comprehensive employee recognition program, you might choose to look beyond a points-based system. The problem with this type of program is that it doesn’t actually deliver an impactful, sustainable solution. Here are a few cons to consider when it comes to points-based programs:
1. Points don’t establish a clear tie between the achievement and the reward
When the employee is rewarded in small point increments, it takes a significant amount of time to build up enough points to actually choose a meaningful employee reward from the catalog. Let’s say an employee receives 20 points every time he or she does something positive at work, but the desired reward isn’t available until 300 points — this forces the employee to wait to accumulate enough before they can actually redeem their reward.
When this occurs, it’s difficult to tie the specific behavior the employee received points for to the employee recognition moment, because the process for receiving the reward was drawn out over such a long period of time. What you want is to have an employee recognition program that easily and swiftly connects the recognition moment with the reward, as well as a clear tie to the behaviors demonstrated, which leads to increased performance output and workforce engagement.
2. Your investment gets backlogged
As mentioned before, with points-based platforms, employees will frequently hoard points to save for larger rewards, which can take place over a long period of time. During this process, one of two things tends to happen:
1.) When the points are finally redeemed, it’s for a sub-par gift like a $50 gift card to Starbucks, which can be a huge letdown. On top of the snooze factor, Consumer Reports shared that almost one in three gift cards will never get used. This is mainly due to people forgetting or losing their cards or leaving a portion of the balance on the card after an initial purchase. As a result, there has been more than $21 billion in cumulative unused card value since the start of 2008.
2.) Employees end up forgetting about the points they were saving. As a result, millions of dollars worth of points end up not being redeemed, which ends up being a waste of benefits funds. This makes utilization reporting a nightmare and can deflate the overall excitement of your program internally — when rolling out new initiatives, you want employees buzzing about the rewards and what they selected, which won’t happen if points sit around collecting dust.
3. They promote a transactional relationship
Should employee appreciation and recognition feel like compensation, or should it feel like a “thank you”? I believe in the latter. Unfortunately, points can end up feeling transactional and disingenuous as they’re just a form of currency that represents a dollar value.
The problem with transactional rewards is that they solely fire up the left side of the brain, triggering feelings of security and guilt if not spent toward “necessary” items (food, shelter, debts). Not to mention that Capgemini Consulting found that while 97% of loyalty programs rely on transactional rewards, and 77% of transaction-based programs fail in the first two years.